Universität Wien

240519 SE MM3 Cosmology - Ideology - Ontology: Anthropological Approaches and Debates (2024S)

Continuous assessment of course work

Participation at first session is obligatory!

The lecturer can invite students to a grade-relevant discussion about partial achievements. Partial achievements that are obtained by fraud or plagiarized result in the non-evaluation of the course (entry 'X' in certificate). The plagiarism software 'Turnitin' will be used.
The use of AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) for the attainment of partial achievements is only allowed if explicitly requested by the course instructor.
We 22.05. 11:30-13:00 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock

Registration/Deregistration

Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).

Details

max. 25 participants
Language: English

Lecturers

Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N

Wednesday 06.03. 11:30 - 13:00 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
Wednesday 13.03. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal A, NIG 4.Stock
Wednesday 20.03. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal A, NIG 4.Stock
Wednesday 10.04. 11:30 - 13:00 Sitzungs-/Prüfungszimmer, NIG 4. Stock
Wednesday 17.04. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal A, NIG 4.Stock
Wednesday 24.04. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal A, NIG 4.Stock
Wednesday 08.05. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal A, NIG 4.Stock
Wednesday 15.05. 11:30 - 13:00 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
Wednesday 29.05. 11:30 - 13:00 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock
Wednesday 05.06. 11:30 - 13:00 Hörsaal C, NIG 4. Stock
Wednesday 12.06. 11:30 - 13:00 Übungsraum (A414) NIG 4. Stock
Wednesday 19.06. 11:30 - 13:00 Seminarraum A, NIG 4. Stock

Information

Aims, contents and method of the course

The course is dedicated to three concepts that have different histories in anthropology. Whereas “cosmology” and “ideology” have been part of anthropology's tool kit for quite some time, the concept of “ontology” has only been discovered more recently by anthropologists. In fact, it has become one of the most fashionable subjects of debate in the discipline in the last two decades or so, provoking some colleagues to speak of an “ontological turn” in anthropology. Rather than merely focusing on this proposed turn, the course places emphasis on historical depth, linking contemporary ontological approaches to earlier discussions about cosmology and ideology. One of the aims of the course is to identify similarities and differences between the concepts, searching for overlappings and incommensurabilities. Another aim is to asses the analytical depth and breadth of the three concepts by looking at their theoretical trajectories and the empirical contexts to which they have been applied. In order to accomplish this, a variety of texts will be read ranging from articles and book chapters that are occupied with (one or more of) the concepts per se to work that introduces the reader to particular ethnographic settings through the concepts. The reading list includes “classic” texts by Marshall Sahlins, Eric Wolf and Louis Dumont as well as more contemporary contributions to the debate, such as by Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, David Graeber, Naomi Haynes and Jason Hickel. Moreover, topics that are analysed in the texts comprise, among others, pre-colonial political systems, anti-colonial movements, nationalism, gender orders, hierarchy and inequality, plantation economies.

After a general introduction into the topic by the lecturer, in the individual sessions of the course the students will present the texts that are on the reading list. For every text, there are at least two discussants that will start the debate. After around one third of the course, the students will submit a brainstorming text that will give them the opportunity to express first ideas about the topic that they have chosen for their seminar paper. This means that in the remaining sessions of the course the conceptualization of their seminar papers will become a recurrent topic.

Assessment and permitted materials

submission of the seminar paper before the deadline; doing at least one presentation; assuming the role of the discussant at least two times; timely submission of the brainstorming text

Minimum requirements and assessment criteria

Seminar paper: 70 points
Presentation: 15 points
Role as discussant: 10 points
Brainstorming text: 5 points

1 (sehr gut): 100-89 points
2 (gut): 88-76 points
3 (befriedigend): 75-63 points
4 (genügend): 62-50 points
5 (nicht genügend): 49-0 points

Examination topics

See above.

Reading list

Abramson, Allen. 2018. “Cosmologies”, The International Encyclopaedia of Anthropology.
Abramson, Allen and Martin Holbraad. 2012. “Contemporary Cosmologies, Critical Reimaginings”, Religion and Society: Advances in Research 3: 35-50.
Wolf, Eric. 2001. “Ideas and Power”, in: Wolf, Eric: Pathways of Power: Building an Anthropology of the Modern World. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 370-382.
Dumont, Louis. 1998. “Introduction”, in: Dumont, Louis: Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Complete Revised English Edition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1-20.
Haynes, Naomi and Jason Hickel. 2016. “Introduction: Hierarchy, Value, and the Value of Hierarchy”, Social Analysis 60(4): 1-20.
Heywood, Paolo. 2017. “The Ontological Turn”, in: Stein, Felix (ed.): The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology.
Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2012. “Common Nonsense: A Review of Certain Recent Reviews of the ‘Ontological Turn’”, Anthropology of this Century 5
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2015. “Who’s Afraid of the Ontological Wolf: Some Comments on an Ongoing Anthropological Debate”, Cambridge Anthropology 33(1): 2-17.
Graeber, David. 2015. “Radical Alterity is Just Another Way of Saying ‘Reality’”, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5, 1-41.
Chao, Sophie. 2018. “In the Shadow of the Palm: Dispersed Ontologies among Marind, West Papua”, Cultural Anthropology 33(4): 621-649.

Association in the course directory

Last modified: Th 14.03.2024 11:06