290010 EX Making Cycle City - Vienna (2013S)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
This excursion is an English-speaking course. Deliverables have to be written in English, too.Please note, that your registration on Moodle is considered as a pre-registration. It does not imply a confirmed participation in the excursion.
After the closing of the registration on March 13th you will be notified whether you have been accepted or not.Timetable:
18 March: Introduction. 08:30 - 12:00 (Lecture Room 5A; Conference Room C0520, NIG, 5th floor)
22 March: Expert Meetings (TBD). 9:00 - 17:00
15 April: Progress Workshop. 17:00 - 19:00. (Lecture Room 4C, NIG, 4th floor)
29 April: Final Presentations. 15:00 -18:00 (Seminar Room C528, 5th floor)
27 May: OPTIONAL Public Presentation. 17:00 - 20:00 (Lecture Room 4C, NIG, 4th floor)
After the closing of the registration on March 13th you will be notified whether you have been accepted or not.Timetable:
18 March: Introduction. 08:30 - 12:00 (Lecture Room 5A; Conference Room C0520, NIG, 5th floor)
22 March: Expert Meetings (TBD). 9:00 - 17:00
15 April: Progress Workshop. 17:00 - 19:00. (Lecture Room 4C, NIG, 4th floor)
29 April: Final Presentations. 15:00 -18:00 (Seminar Room C528, 5th floor)
27 May: OPTIONAL Public Presentation. 17:00 - 20:00 (Lecture Room 4C, NIG, 4th floor)
Details
max. 30 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes
Currently no class schedule is known.
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
1. Soft Skills (20%)
attendance, participation, punctuality2. Theme Analysis & Presentation (80%)
Comprehensive understanding of local processes, actors, instruments
Application of appropriate methods (e.g. mapping, perception analysis)
Development of own action approaches
Policy and operational recommendations
Preparation of Interim Report including references and analysis outcomes
Presentation of thematic analysis
Optional: Defence of own ideas during discussion with expert jury
attendance, participation, punctuality2. Theme Analysis & Presentation (80%)
Comprehensive understanding of local processes, actors, instruments
Application of appropriate methods (e.g. mapping, perception analysis)
Development of own action approaches
Policy and operational recommendations
Preparation of Interim Report including references and analysis outcomes
Presentation of thematic analysis
Optional: Defence of own ideas during discussion with expert jury
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
In terms of methodological skills, this excursion is aiming at a comprehensive actors analysis accompanied by implementation and policy recommendations as well as at the ability to present the results to a public audience.With regard to the content, this excursion enables students to identify key actors and analyse urban policies with regard to cycling in Vienna. Key research questions are :
1. How does the current cycle situation look like in Vienna (e.g. modal split, infrastructure, cycling activists, public debate, media representation)?
2. What kind of political aims does the City of Vienna follow concerning cycling in Vienna ?
3. Who are the main actors/stakeholders?
4. What is being done so far ? Political, operational and technical changes as well as behaviour setting of cylists.
5. How does the situation look like at the district level ? What obstacles hinder progress? What compromises can be made? What costs are involved (financial, social, political, etc)? Who pays them? How to argue for that payment?
6. Can we identify additional potential in order to improve cycling at the district and city level ? How could approaches of action look like ?
1. How does the current cycle situation look like in Vienna (e.g. modal split, infrastructure, cycling activists, public debate, media representation)?
2. What kind of political aims does the City of Vienna follow concerning cycling in Vienna ?
3. Who are the main actors/stakeholders?
4. What is being done so far ? Political, operational and technical changes as well as behaviour setting of cylists.
5. How does the situation look like at the district level ? What obstacles hinder progress? What compromises can be made? What costs are involved (financial, social, political, etc)? Who pays them? How to argue for that payment?
6. Can we identify additional potential in order to improve cycling at the district and city level ? How could approaches of action look like ?
Examination topics
Each group (max. 6 students) is assigned a specific theme. Their task is to compose a complete yet concise evaluation of the theme (see « course description ») as it pertains to Vienna by:
(1) identifying relevant actors, conflicts, and opportunities;
(2) evaluating existing plans & processes ;
(3) conducting interviews and field research;
(4) proposing amendments for improvement;
(5) considering applicability of best practices from beyond Vienna;
(6) creating graphics (maps, photos, videos, etc.) when appropriate;
(7) collaborating with the other groups to relate their theme to the other three;
(8) reporting their findings in an engaging, well-crafted, rehearsed presentation.
(1) identifying relevant actors, conflicts, and opportunities;
(2) evaluating existing plans & processes ;
(3) conducting interviews and field research;
(4) proposing amendments for improvement;
(5) considering applicability of best practices from beyond Vienna;
(6) creating graphics (maps, photos, videos, etc.) when appropriate;
(7) collaborating with the other groups to relate their theme to the other three;
(8) reporting their findings in an engaging, well-crafted, rehearsed presentation.
Reading list
1. Sustainable Urban MobilityBLÄSER, JANSEN AND WEHMAYER (2012) : Urbane Mobilität der Zukunft. In : Raumplanung 165, 6-2012, pages 56-59.
LUCA BERTOLINI, FRANK LE CLERCQ (2002): Urban development without more mobility by car? Lessons from Amsterdam, a multimodal urban region. In: Environment and Planning A 2003, volume 35, pages 575 – 589.LOUKOPOULOS PETER AND ROLAND W SCHOLZ (2004) : Sustainable future urban mobility: using area development negotiations; for scenario assessment and participatory strategic planning. In : Environment and Planning A 2004, volume 36, pages 2203 - 22262. Cycling in the CityPETER MIDGLEY (2009) : The Role of Smart Bike-sharing Systems in Urban Mobility. In : JOURNEYS May 2009, pages 23-31.3. Cycling in ViennaEUROPEAN CYCLISTS FEDERATION AND CITY OF VIENNA (2012) : Velo-City 2013. The Sound of Cycling. Urban Cycling Cultures. Fact Sheet.
http://velo-city2013.com/wp-content/uploads/factsheet_velo-city-2013_en.pdf
STADTENTWICKLUNG WIEN, MAGISTRATSABTEILUNG 18 (2003) : Transport Master Plan Vienna 2003.
http://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/shop/broschueren/pdf/mpv2003-kurzfassung-englisch.pdf
LUCA BERTOLINI, FRANK LE CLERCQ (2002): Urban development without more mobility by car? Lessons from Amsterdam, a multimodal urban region. In: Environment and Planning A 2003, volume 35, pages 575 – 589.LOUKOPOULOS PETER AND ROLAND W SCHOLZ (2004) : Sustainable future urban mobility: using area development negotiations; for scenario assessment and participatory strategic planning. In : Environment and Planning A 2004, volume 36, pages 2203 - 22262. Cycling in the CityPETER MIDGLEY (2009) : The Role of Smart Bike-sharing Systems in Urban Mobility. In : JOURNEYS May 2009, pages 23-31.3. Cycling in ViennaEUROPEAN CYCLISTS FEDERATION AND CITY OF VIENNA (2012) : Velo-City 2013. The Sound of Cycling. Urban Cycling Cultures. Fact Sheet.
http://velo-city2013.com/wp-content/uploads/factsheet_velo-city-2013_en.pdf
STADTENTWICKLUNG WIEN, MAGISTRATSABTEILUNG 18 (2003) : Transport Master Plan Vienna 2003.
http://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/shop/broschueren/pdf/mpv2003-kurzfassung-englisch.pdf
Association in the course directory
(B11-7.3) (B07-7.3) (MG3-EX) (MR7-EX) (L-EX)
Last modified: Fr 31.08.2018 08:56
Students will role-play as consultants tasked with elucidating and evaluating the making of Cycle City: Vienna by conducting field work within four overlapping themes:1. the politics of cycle planning
2. the challenges of implementation
3. the development of cycling culture, and
4. the risks & opportunities of the Velo-city Conference.