290105 VU Introduction to Public Participation GIS Methods for Spatial Research and Spatial Planning (2022W)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 05.09.2022 09:00 to Mo 19.09.2022 09:00
- Registration is open from We 21.09.2022 09:00 to Fr 30.09.2022 12:00
- Deregistration possible until Mo 31.10.2022 23:59
Details
max. 15 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
- Friday 04.11. 10:00 - 13:00 Multimedia Mapping-Labor, NIG 1.Stock C0110
- Friday 11.11. 10:00 - 16:00 Multimedia Mapping-Labor, NIG 1.Stock C0110
- Friday 18.11. 10:00 - 16:00 Multimedia Mapping-Labor, NIG 1.Stock C0110
- Friday 25.11. 10:00 - 16:00 Multimedia Mapping-Labor, NIG 1.Stock C0110
- Friday 02.12. 10:00 - 16:00 Multimedia Mapping-Labor, NIG 1.Stock C0110
- Friday 16.12. 10:00 - 16:00 Multimedia Mapping-Labor, NIG 1.Stock C0110
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
The final grade is based 50% on the course portfolio compiled from course assignments and 50% on a learning diary that will be completed during the course. Active participation in in-class discussions will increase the grade. There is no final exam.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
To successfully complete the course, the student is expected toParticipate in all contact teaching sessions (unavoidable absences allowed with teacher’s permission)
Complete both the course portfolio and learning diary with passing grades.
Examination topics
There is no final exam.
Reading list
Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2018). Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Applied Geography, 95, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.002Brown, G., Reed, P., & Raymond, C. M. (2020). Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research. Applied Geography, 116, 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102156Fagerholm, N., Raymond, C. M., Olafsson, A. S., Brown, G., Rinne, T., Hasanzadeh, K., … Kyttä, M. (2021). A methodological framework for analysis of participatory mapping data in research, planning, and management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 00(00), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2020.1869747Fagerholm, N., Samuelsson, K., Eilola, S., Giusti, M., Hasanzadeh, K., Kajosaari, A., … Barthel, S. (2022). Analysis of pandemic outdoor recreation and green infrastructure in Nordic cities to enhance urban resilience. Npj Urban Sustainability, 2(25). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-022-00068-8Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., Młodkowski, M., Zwoliński, Z., & Wójcicki, M. (2019). Evaluating the scalability of public participation in urban land use planning: A comparison of Geoweb methods with face-to-face meetings. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(3), 511–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317719709Kahila-Tani, M., Kyttä, M., & Geertman, S. (2019). Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 186(February), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.019Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Tzoulas, T., & Snabb, K. (2013). Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 113, 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.008Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), 1766–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023
Association in the course directory
(MR1-a/b-PI) (MR3-PI) (MR FW-PI)
Last modified: We 19.10.2022 17:09
PPGIS refers to a growing field of participatory planning and research methods used to study of person-environment interactions. Common to these methods is the aim to capture spatial knowledge produced by non-expert participants based on their own experience and expertise of their lived environment. In contrast to conventional participatory mapping methods, contemporary applications of PPGIS use digital tools for data collection. This enables large-scale data collection, as well as the joint analysis of primary spatial data produced by respondents together with secondary sources of geographic data, such as land-use, georeferenced census data, or planning documents. Today, PPGIS methods are applied in various fields for locating and communicating place-based experiential knowledge from respondents and residents.
During the course the participants will develop a good working understanding of digital participatory mapping methods as tools for research and planning practice as well as of the best practices of collecting and working with participatory mapping data. Participants will practice designing map-based surveys, data analysis, and visualization.
After completing the course, participants will be