390007 KU PhD-M: Academic Writing & Publishing (2022S)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
REMOTE
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 07.02.2022 09:00 to Mo 21.02.2022 23:59
- Deregistration possible until Mo 14.03.2022 23:59
Details
max. 24 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
Prerequisites:
First writing experience (in English). Please note that attendance is expected on all three days. Please bring a written piece of writing (ideally a full paper) to the first class. Please also identify a paper that you really like and bring it to the first class.
- Thursday 03.03. 09:45 - 17:00 Digital
- Friday 04.03. 09:45 - 17:00 Digital
- Monday 07.03. 09:45 - 17:00 Digital
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Assessment and permitted materials
Revise an academic article by applying the contents learned in the course.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
1 ≥ 88%
2 ≥ 75%
3 ≥ 63%
4 ≥ 50%
2 ≥ 75%
3 ≥ 63%
4 ≥ 50%
Examination topics
Reading list
Recommended readings:Day 1
Pinker, Steven (2014). The source of bad writing. The Wall Street Journal.
https://www.wetenschappelijkschrijven.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Essay-The-Curse-of-Knowledge-by-Steven-Pinker.pdf
(This is a just a warm-up reading).Bem, Daryl J. (2000), "Writing an empirical article." Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals: 2-20.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.687.6970&rep=rep1&type=pdf
(Please note that Bem was harshly criticized for some of his work; nevertheless, I consider this paper as very helpful)Grant, Adam M., and Timothy G. Pollock (2011), "Publishing in AMJ—Part 3: Setting the hook." Academy of Management Journal, 54.5:873-879.
https://journals.aom.org/doi/full/10.5465/amj.2011.4000Pollock, Timothy G., and Joyce E. Bono (2013), "Being Scheherazade: The importance of storytelling in academic writing." Academy of Management Journal, 56.3:629-634.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d2a/b189d7e02d51ef0db4bfa69e2f8133667b2b.pdfRynes, S. (2002) "Some reflections on contribution." Academy of Management Journal, 45.2: 311-313.Day 2
McCloskey, Donald (1985), "Economical writing." Economic Inquiry 23.2: 187-222.
http://w.deirdremccloskey.com/docs/pdf/Article_86.pdfWilliams, Joseph (1990). Toward Clarity and Grace. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
https://sites.duke.edu/niou/files/2014/07/WilliamsJosephM1990StyleTowardClarityandGrace.pdf
(I consider this book as the “bible” for good writing)Day 3
Shaw, Jason D. (2012) "Responding to reviewers." Academy of Management Journal, 1261-1263.
https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amj.2012.4006?journalCode=amj
Pinker, Steven (2014). The source of bad writing. The Wall Street Journal.
https://www.wetenschappelijkschrijven.nl/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Essay-The-Curse-of-Knowledge-by-Steven-Pinker.pdf
(This is a just a warm-up reading).Bem, Daryl J. (2000), "Writing an empirical article." Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals: 2-20.
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.687.6970&rep=rep1&type=pdf
(Please note that Bem was harshly criticized for some of his work; nevertheless, I consider this paper as very helpful)Grant, Adam M., and Timothy G. Pollock (2011), "Publishing in AMJ—Part 3: Setting the hook." Academy of Management Journal, 54.5:873-879.
https://journals.aom.org/doi/full/10.5465/amj.2011.4000Pollock, Timothy G., and Joyce E. Bono (2013), "Being Scheherazade: The importance of storytelling in academic writing." Academy of Management Journal, 56.3:629-634.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0d2a/b189d7e02d51ef0db4bfa69e2f8133667b2b.pdfRynes, S. (2002) "Some reflections on contribution." Academy of Management Journal, 45.2: 311-313.Day 2
McCloskey, Donald (1985), "Economical writing." Economic Inquiry 23.2: 187-222.
http://w.deirdremccloskey.com/docs/pdf/Article_86.pdfWilliams, Joseph (1990). Toward Clarity and Grace. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
https://sites.duke.edu/niou/files/2014/07/WilliamsJosephM1990StyleTowardClarityandGrace.pdf
(I consider this book as the “bible” for good writing)Day 3
Shaw, Jason D. (2012) "Responding to reviewers." Academy of Management Journal, 1261-1263.
https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amj.2012.4006?journalCode=amj
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Th 11.05.2023 11:28
Students doing a PhD at the Faculty of Business, Statistics, and Economics.Content:
Macro principles of good writing and publishing – Day 1
• What makes a paper a good paper; why do some paper get published and others not
• Topic selection: Finding your conversation, finding a story to tell
• Structuring a paper
• Creating tension
• How best craft key elements of paper: how do you structure the abstract, the introduction, the theory section, or the general discussion section.Micro principles of good writing – Day 2
• Good sections, good paragraphing (pyramid principle, topic sentences etc.)
• Rules for building strong sentences, cohesion among sentences (e.g., relating to action characters, strong verbs, 2-3-1, paragraphing, creating overlap, from known to unknown, concision)
• Choice of tense and mode to fit section of the paper and the content, choice of words that send the right “signals”, etc.
• Conducting your writing project: Strategies for productive writing and editingWriting to be read – Day 3
• Writing to get published in leading academic journals
• Writing strategies
• Surviving the review process – insights from a reviewer and AE perspective
• Measuring and managing your impact as a scholar
• Ethics of writing and publishingIntended learning outcomes:
(1) At the end of this course, participants know how to craft high quality papers.
(2) Participants know the principles of good academic writing, and recognize these principles.
(3) Participants improve their own writing and editing.
(4) Participants understand the publishing process, including research ethics issues that can arise in its course.
(5) Participants understand how scholarly impact is created and measured, and can apply this knowledge to increase their own impact.
(6) Participants get an understanding why many papers get rejected.Please find more information on the homepage: https://marketing.univie.ac.at/studium/phd-management/lvs-von-marketing/