410005 SE Interdisziplinary Seminar: Normativity and Multinormativity: Polyvalenz in historical narratives (2020S)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 03.02.2020 09:00 to Mo 24.02.2020 08:00
- Deregistration possible until Tu 31.03.2020 23:59
Details
max. 18 participants
Language: German
Lecturers
Classes
Dienstag, 17.03.2020, 9:00-11:00 Uhr, SR AB3.24.2 für Byzantinistik Augasse 2-6, 3.OG Kern A
Dienstag, 24.03.2020, 9:00-11:00 Uhr, SR AB3.24.2 für Byzantinistik Augasse 2-6, 3.OG Kern A
Dienstag, 31.03.2020, 9:00-11:00 Uhr, SR AB3.24.2 für Byzantinistik Augasse 2-6, 3.OG Kern A
Dienstag, 28.04.2020, 9:00-11:00 Uhr, SR AB3.24.2 für Byzantinistik Augasse 2-6, 3.OG Kern A
Dienstag, 05.05.2020, 9:00-11:00 Uhr SR AB3.24.2 für Byzantinistik Augasse 2-6, 3.OG Kern A
Ganztägiger Workshop am 09.06.2020, SR AB3.24.2 für Byzantinistik Augasse 2-6, 3.OG Kern A
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
This interdisciplinary seminar is aimed at doctoral students who deal with the issues of norms and effective law in their dissertations. In addition to fundamental legal sociological texts on the application of norms and normative pluralism, the seminar also discusses theoretical contributions to the current debate on multinormativity. The concept of multinormativity tries to get an eye on the normative resources that were available when solving problems and could come into conflict with each other, as well as to analyze the normative requirements of thinking and acting.
Assessment and permitted materials
The switch to home learning has forced us to adapt the organisation of the seminar. The learning contents and the learning objectives remain unchanged.
The discussion of the readings still serve the purpose of providing the participants with suggestions for their own work. The discussion of the readings will be shifted to the virtual space of the Moodle forums, however. For each text we expect three contributions: a) a short essay of about 1-2 pages in length, in which the argumentation of the reading is briefly summarized; b) a thesis-like formulation of the relevance of this reading for one's own research; c) comments on the theses of the others.
The oral presentation at the end of the seminar will remain. In the event that normal operation has not been restored by then, it will take the form of a short video that will be uploaded to Moodle where it will be commented on and discussed by the participants.
The discussion of the readings still serve the purpose of providing the participants with suggestions for their own work. The discussion of the readings will be shifted to the virtual space of the Moodle forums, however. For each text we expect three contributions: a) a short essay of about 1-2 pages in length, in which the argumentation of the reading is briefly summarized; b) a thesis-like formulation of the relevance of this reading for one's own research; c) comments on the theses of the others.
The oral presentation at the end of the seminar will remain. In the event that normal operation has not been restored by then, it will take the form of a short video that will be uploaded to Moodle where it will be commented on and discussed by the participants.
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
- active participation in the discussions of mandatory reading in the Moodle forums, after normal operation is restored, attendance is mandatory again, students may be absent twice without excuse.
- The presentation is mandatory.
Assessment standard:
The performance assessment is based on the following weighting:
- Participation in the discussion including various forms of feedback for other participants* (constructive, technically correct contributions and commitment in discussing the presentations): 50 points
- Oral presentation including handout: 50 points
For a positive assessment of the course, 60 points are required, the proseminar work must be positive (one-time improvement possibility with negative result):
1 (very good) 100-90 points
2 (good) 89-81 points
3 (satisfactory) 80-71 points
4 (sufficient) 70-60 points
5 (not sufficient) 59-0 points
3 (satisfactory) 80-71 points
4 (enough) 70-60 points
5 (failed) 59-0 points
- The presentation is mandatory.
Assessment standard:
The performance assessment is based on the following weighting:
- Participation in the discussion including various forms of feedback for other participants* (constructive, technically correct contributions and commitment in discussing the presentations): 50 points
- Oral presentation including handout: 50 points
For a positive assessment of the course, 60 points are required, the proseminar work must be positive (one-time improvement possibility with negative result):
1 (very good) 100-90 points
2 (good) 89-81 points
3 (satisfactory) 80-71 points
4 (sufficient) 70-60 points
5 (not sufficient) 59-0 points
3 (satisfactory) 80-71 points
4 (enough) 70-60 points
5 (failed) 59-0 points
Examination topics
All content discussed in the course. Supporting learning materials can be found on Moodle.
Reading list
s. Moodle
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Sa 14.03.2020 14:09