420006 SE From description to explanation (and back) (2022S)
From description to explanation (and back)
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Registration/Deregistration
Note: The time of your registration within the registration period has no effect on the allocation of places (no first come, first served).
- Registration is open from Mo 07.02.2022 09:00 to Mo 28.02.2022 08:00
- Deregistration possible until Mo 07.03.2022 08:00
Details
max. 18 participants
Language: English
Lecturers
Classes
The course will be held in English.
Starting and end dates: 09.3.2022 - 27.6.2022
Time: Mi, 16:15-17:45
Room: tba
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
Due to the strong emphasis on digital humanities over the last decade, much attention is nowadays directed towards ways of gathering and processing data. In this course, however, we will focus on another crucial step in the process of doing linguistic research, that of building up a coherent argument on the basis of the collected data; i.e. of turning data into evidence. In other words, we will look at how data (of any kind) can be used to make a valid point within the parameters chosen for the study in question, and how, if done successfully, this can lead to new insights into and implications for the particular topic/field of interest. For this purpose, we will look at published articles to find out how successful authors are (or not) in using their data to argue their point (independently of whether the reader agrees with the approach taken).
Assessment and permitted materials
Assessment is based on class participation, tasks and assignments; oral presentation
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
• Regular attendance (maximum 2 absences)
• Active in-class participation (33%)
• Presentation on your PhD project (33%)
• Submit all tasks on time (33%)
Rating scale:
• Sehr gut (1): 90-100%
• Gut (2): 80-89%
• Befriedigend (3): 70-79%
• Genügend (4): 60-69%
• Nicht genügend (5): 0-59%
• Active in-class participation (33%)
• Presentation on your PhD project (33%)
• Submit all tasks on time (33%)
Rating scale:
• Sehr gut (1): 90-100%
• Gut (2): 80-89%
• Befriedigend (3): 70-79%
• Genügend (4): 60-69%
• Nicht genügend (5): 0-59%
Examination topics
During in-class discussions, in an oral presentation, as well as in written assignments, students will have to show their ability to analyse and evaluate academic articles in terms of the clarity and appropriateness of the arguments presented and the validity of the conclusions drawn by the author (given the data provided).
Reading list
The readings for this course will include several research articles from different areas of linguistics, and the following two "meta-discussions" of linguistic argumentation:John Beavers & Peter Sells. 2013. Constructing and supporting a linguistic argument. In Podesva, Robert J. & Devyani Sharma (eds), Research Methods in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Seidlhofer, Barbara (ed). 2003. Controversies in Applied Linguistics. "Controversy 9". Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 279-323.
Association in the course directory
Last modified: Fr 11.02.2022 09:49