Warning! The directory is not yet complete and will be amended until the beginning of the term.
590002 SE Methodology & methods (2025S)
Systematic Literature Reviews
Continuous assessment of course work
Labels
Details
max. 15 participants
Language: German, English
Lecturers
Classes (iCal) - next class is marked with N
The seminar is offered hybrid. If you participate online, using a camera is mandatory.
- N Wednesday 05.03. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 19.03. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 26.03. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 02.04. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 09.04. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 30.04. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 07.05. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 14.05. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 21.05. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 28.05. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 04.06. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 11.06. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 18.06. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
- Wednesday 25.06. 16:45 - 18:15 Seminarraum 6 Sensengasse 3a 2.OG
Information
Aims, contents and method of the course
The aim of the seminar is to develop advanced knowledge and practices for the application of the structured literature analysis method. Current practices (such as the PRISM scheme) are first taken into account and then analyzed using bibliometric methods from library and information science. Methodologically, individual readings, small group and plenary discussions as well as collegial comments will be conducted.
Assessment and permitted materials
In the seminar you will
- write position papers about readings,
- develop a research question with special consideration of your PhD topic,
- write a methodologically sound, structured literature review on your chosen topic and
- give collegial comments on an essay of other students
- write position papers about readings,
- develop a research question with special consideration of your PhD topic,
- write a methodologically sound, structured literature review on your chosen topic and
- give collegial comments on an essay of other students
Minimum requirements and assessment criteria
Minimum requirements:
- Attendance
- Reading texts
- Writing a text
- Peer review of a colleague's text
- Revision of own text
- Position papers
Assessment standard:
- Writing a text: 60 points
- Reviewing a text: 10 points
- Position Papers 30 points50 points are required for a positive assessment of the course.
1 (very good) 80-100 points
2 (good) 70-79 points
3 (satisfactory) 60-69 points
4 (sufficient) 50-59 points
5 (insufficient) 0-49 points
To ensure good academic practice, students may be invited to a grade-relevant interview after handing in the seminar paper, which must be completed positively. In case of plagiarism of a partial performance, the entire seminar counts as plagiarised.
- Attendance
- Reading texts
- Writing a text
- Peer review of a colleague's text
- Revision of own text
- Position papers
Assessment standard:
- Writing a text: 60 points
- Reviewing a text: 10 points
- Position Papers 30 points50 points are required for a positive assessment of the course.
1 (very good) 80-100 points
2 (good) 70-79 points
3 (satisfactory) 60-69 points
4 (sufficient) 50-59 points
5 (insufficient) 0-49 points
To ensure good academic practice, students may be invited to a grade-relevant interview after handing in the seminar paper, which must be completed positively. In case of plagiarism of a partial performance, the entire seminar counts as plagiarised.
Examination topics
The examination material consists of content relevant to the texts produced and the texts provided.
Reading list
Ball, Rafael (2021): Handbook Bibliometrics
Bawden David; Robinso, Lyn (2022): Introduction to information science
Moher, D; Liberati, A; Tetzlaff, J; Altman, DG (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine. 6 (7). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BJM. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Topor, Marta; Pickering, Jade S.; Mendes, Ana Barbosa; Bishop, Dorothy V. M.; Büttner, Fionn; Elsherif, Mahmoud M.; Evans, Thomas R.; Henderson, Emma L.; Kalandadze, Tamara; Nitschke, Faye T.; Staaks, Janneke P. C.; Akker, Olmo R. van den; Yeung, Siu Kit; Zaneva, Mirela; Lam, Alison (10 July 2023). 'An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR)'. Meta-Psychology. 7. doi:10.15626/MP.2021.2840
Bawden David; Robinso, Lyn (2022): Introduction to information science
Moher, D; Liberati, A; Tetzlaff, J; Altman, DG (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine. 6 (7). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BJM. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Topor, Marta; Pickering, Jade S.; Mendes, Ana Barbosa; Bishop, Dorothy V. M.; Büttner, Fionn; Elsherif, Mahmoud M.; Evans, Thomas R.; Henderson, Emma L.; Kalandadze, Tamara; Nitschke, Faye T.; Staaks, Janneke P. C.; Akker, Olmo R. van den; Yeung, Siu Kit; Zaneva, Mirela; Lam, Alison (10 July 2023). 'An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR)'. Meta-Psychology. 7. doi:10.15626/MP.2021.2840
Association in the course directory
DSE
Last modified: Fr 10.01.2025 00:02