150122 VU Strategic Gaming in the South China Sea (2021W)

In the South China Sea, Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Vietnam dispute about overlapping territorial and sovereignty claims. Being supposedly rich in oil and gas resources as well as minerals and fish, these nations claim “islands”, reefs and rocks. However, most claims are legally and politically contested, notably the so-called nine-dash or U-line claimed both by Beijing and Taipei which covers about 90 percent of the South China Sea. China does not comply with the 2016 award of the Permanent Court of Arbitration which rejects the legal base of the nine-dash line under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).

As the South China Sea is a globally important sea line of communication, outside actors such as the US, Japan, India and the European Union have a strategic interest in maritime security, further complicating the overall security situation. The US responds to China’s land reclamation activities and the militarization of its artificial islands with dispatching its navy and regularly conducting Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPs) to uphold international law. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China have so far failed to draft the envisioned regional Code of Conduct to mitigate the territorial disputes. ASEAN, however, is not engaged in concrete talks to resolve the disputes as China only negotiates on a bilateral level with the Southeast Asian claimant states.

This course is a negotiation simulation, simulating a real-world scenario in the controlled setting of the classroom. Simulating a complex conflict from the realm of international relations, participants form groups of “diplomats” (3–6 students) representing states and international organizations. Groups simulate the role of their respective actor and interact with other actors with the aim of fulfilling their set of objectives (“national interests”) utilizing a certain range of means. Interaction of actors is based on a fictional, yet realistic plot distributed to students before the game days.

Day 1 (approx. 3:15 hours): Introductory presentations. Students will get practical information about strategic gaming and negotiation skills (M. Mandl) as well as on the disputes in the South China Sea (A. Gerstl). At the end of day 1, students will form actor groups, namely ASEAN, China, the US, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam and Japan. Depending on the number of students additional groups can be formed (Taiwan, India, Australia, Russia, the EU …).

Day 2 & 3 (weekend): At the beginning of day 2, each group will formulate certain targets and the means of reaching these targets based on each actor’s individual position in the conflict, the overall strategic situation in East Asia and the scenario drafted in the plot. Groups will then be able to enter formal and informal bi- and multilateral negotiations in order to formulate a common agreement at a fictional ASEAN-organized meeting (taking place on both game days). Actors do not necessarily need to agree on a common solution, but rather continuously aim at enforcing their own interests.

The main aims of the Strategic Gaming are:
- Gaining knowledge of the complex constellations in the South China Sea disputes, the overall security situation in East Asia and of the impacts of different conflicts on each other
- Acquiring a deeper understanding of the interests, positions and policies of the parties concerned
- Developing skills to enhance strategic thinking, acting and negotiating in complex negotiation situations.
In our case of the South China Sea dispute, students will form groups of “diplomats” representing the key actors (3–6 students, depending on the total number of students). These groups will include the main regional and external actors (i.e., China, the USA, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Japan ...) and international organization (ASEAN/ASEAN Regional Forum).